Have Today's Filmmakers Ruined Good Lighting?

In partnership with

For centuries, art has constantly shifted between stylization and realism. In the late 18th and early 19th centuries, movements like Romanticism and Neoclassicism dominated painting. Romantic works were emotional, dramatic, colorful, and idealized. Neoclassical paintings emphasized beauty, balance, and grandeur. But by the mid-19th century, realism began to rise among artists who wanted to portray ordinary life as it truly was rather than as an idealized fantasy. Paintings became more grounded, more subdued, and often visually darker. Artists became increasingly interested in authenticity over spectacle.

Today, something very similar appears to be happening in film.

Discontented Viewers

Over the past few years, social media has become flooded with comparisons between older movies and newer ones. People often point to films from the 1990s and early 2000s and argue that movies simply “looked better” back then. Warmer lighting, richer colors, softer highlights, and more stylized cinematography are frequently contrasted against the cooler, flatter, more muted appearance of many modern productions.

One film that has recently reignited this discussion is The Devil Wears Prada. With conversations surrounding its sequel, audiences are once again seeing just how much visual aesthetics have changed in twenty years. The original film feels glossy, colorful, warm, and heightened. By comparison, many contemporary films and streaming series lean heavily into desaturated palettes, softer contrast, naturalistic lighting, and subdued production design. For many viewers, modern productions feel dull, lifeless, or visually sterile.

But why did this shift happen?

The Trends That Shape Our World

Part of the answer comes down to changing artistic preferences. Cinematography trends evolve the same way architecture, fashion, interior design, and graphic design evolve. Modern aesthetics across nearly every industry currently lean toward minimalism and realism. We see it in gray interiors, neutral clothing palettes, clean corporate branding, and photorealistic video games. Across culture as a whole, there has been a growing preference for things that feel grounded, understated, and emotionally authentic.

Because of this, heavily stylized lighting techniques that once defined mainstream films can now feel artificial to modern audiences. The warm glows, polished glamour, and dramatic backlights common in early 2000s cinema may now remind viewers of Hallmark movies, daytime television, or lower-budget productions. In response, filmmakers increasingly moved toward imagery that feels observational rather than theatrical — as though the camera is simply capturing reality instead of enhancing it.

However, artistic preference is only part of the story. Technology fundamentally changed the look of movies as well.

Older film cameras and early digital cameras captured far less detail and dynamic range than modern cinema cameras. Cinematographers had to light scenes more aggressively in order to create separation, shape, and texture. Lighting setups were often more stylized because they needed to be. Film stock itself also rendered color, contrast, and highlights differently, creating the softer glow and warmth many people now associate with older movies.

Then digital cinematography rapidly evolved. Modern cameras can capture extraordinary detail even in low light, allowing filmmakers to use subtler and more naturalistic lighting setups. At the same time, the industry transitioned heavily toward LED lighting, which is cheaper, cooler, programmable, and more energy efficient than traditional tungsten fixtures. LEDs offer incredible control, but they also contributed to the cleaner and sometimes more clinical appearance of modern productions.

Streaming also influenced the aesthetic. Content designed primarily for televisions, laptops, and phones often favors flatter lighting and restrained contrast to ensure visibility across different screens and compressed streaming formats. Over time, these technical choices helped normalize a more muted cinematic language.

But beneath all the technical and artistic reasons lies something deeper: psychology.

Viewing Films of the Past With Rose-Colored Glasses

The movies we grow up with become emotionally attached to our memories, identities, and sense of comfort. When people say older films “looked better,” they are often responding not only to lighting and color grading, but to the emotional experience tied to those visuals. The warm glow of a 2000s romantic comedy or the saturated colors of a childhood favorite can instantly transport someone back to another period of their life. Those visual styles become emotional time capsules.

There is also a psychological tendency for people to romanticize the aesthetics of the past because the past itself feels emotionally safer and more stable in memory. Every generation tends to view the art they grew up with as more soulful or authentic than what comes after it. It is the same reason older generations often criticize modern music, fashion, or architecture. Visual culture becomes deeply tied to identity, nostalgia, and the passage of time itself.

But none of this means modern cinematography is inherently worse, nor does it mean the older style is gone forever.

The Trends, They Come and Go… and Come Again

Art moves in cycles. The same way realism overtook Romanticism, stylization eventually found its way back into painting in new forms. Fashion trends return. Vinyl records return. Retro game design returns. Audiences eventually grow tired of one aesthetic and begin craving another. In fact, the growing online conversation about warm lighting, expressive colors, and stylized cinematography may already signal that the pendulum is starting to swing back again.

Cinema is always evolving, but it never completely abandons its past. The visual language of older films still lives in the memories of audiences and in the inspirations of younger filmmakers. And if history tells us anything, it is that art never moves in a straight line. Eventually, the vibrant, expressive look people miss may once again become the future of film.

The free newsletter making HR less lonely

The best HR advice comes from people who’ve been in the trenches.

That’s what this newsletter delivers.

I Hate it Here is your insider’s guide to surviving and thriving in HR, from someone who’s been there. It’s not about theory or buzzwords — it’s about practical, real-world advice for navigating everything from tricky managers to messy policies.

Every newsletter is written by Hebba Youssef — a Chief People Officer who’s seen it all and is here to share what actually works (and what doesn’t). We’re talking real talk, real strategies, and real support — all with a side of humor to keep you sane.

Because HR shouldn’t feel like a thankless job. And you shouldn’t feel alone in it.

Sign Up Free